When we discussed categorizing in general, and music specifically, in class, our teacher, Mr. Ajjarapu explained that he personally categorizes all music into rock vs. pop. A more appropriate label would be rebellious vs. socially acceptable. I can follow the thematic nature of the classification system but I don't find it useful to my evaluation of music. Rather than thinking about revolutionary vs. conforming, I classify music by how it makes me feel.
The reason I classify music in this manner is because I listen to what intensifies my mood at the time or changes it to one more preferred. If I go on a run, I listen to energizing, rapid, bass-heavy music loudly. If I feel happy, I'll listen to Colbie Caillat, Zac Brown, "Just Another Day in Paradise", The Mowgli's, Bruno Mars et cetera. If I feel passionate, soulful, I might listen to Hunter Hayes, Ed Sheeran, Train, et cetera.
I think the reason we all choose different methods of classifying our music is based on the manner in which music serves us. For example, I utilize music to affect my emotions, manipulate my emotions. I believe that Mr. Ajjarapu classifies his music the way he does because he has become so educated in music and all of its variety that he is seeking out new styles, musical ingenuity, creativity. This is why while he can still appreciate pop, the value of rock is far greater. May he correct me next class on whatever part of my analysis he considers incorrect.
No comments:
Post a Comment